Anchoring Ban on Belly and Long Putters

My Reaction to the Ban on Anchored Putting

The USGA and the R&A have agreed to ban anchoring on the stroke in 2016. Evidently, these governing bodies feel they “should amend the rule to preserve the traditional character of the golf swing”.

But is it good for the game?

I’m leaning towards… NO

Anchoring the putter has been around since the 1930’s, but wasn’t really on the scene until Orville Moody used it to win a tournament in 1989. Even then it didn’t gain much popularity until Keegan Bradley, Webb Simpson, and Ernie Els experienced success with it on tour. The USGA emphatically states that this ban is not based on the recent success of these players or performance related, but rather the idea that the putting stroke in the next generation will be changed forever.

I can see their point, the stroke may change. Teaching pro’s are now encouraging junior students to use the belly or long putter. And kids are embracing it because they see their idols using it on TV. Change is happening.

Is that a bad thing?

Steve Stricker said he felt like anchoring the putter provides an advantage. If this were the case why hasn’t he switched?

The reason is belly putters and long putters do NOT provide an advantage. Lets assume they do. Why haven’t great players like Stricker switched? Because anchoring does not turn your putter into a magic wand. It provides a different feel. A feeling that breeds confidence on the putting green. No different than the feeling Phil Mickelson or Mark O’Meara get from the claw grip.

The ban on anchoring putters is the USGA’s way of preserving tradition. But you don’t see players wearing jackets or ladies wearing dresses anymore. What about wooden clubs and hickory shafts. Technology evolves and the USGA has virtually eliminated the ball from traveling farther, the ball from moving faster, club heads from getting bigger, shafts from getting longer. Ultimately they have limited technology. I am 100% in agreement with them on these areas, but putting styles or how you swing a club should not be governed.

The belly and long putters revive careers and provide an alternative to the conventional stroke. It’s not a guarantee for success.

I have never stepped foot on the first tee and felt someone with a long putter has an advantage on me. That will never be the case.

What about you?

TAGS: , , ,

149 Comments

  1. When I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each and every time a comment is added I get 4 emails using the same comment. Is there any way you’re able to eliminate me from that service? Thanks!

    christian louboutin shoes

    • CJ Goecks says:

      You should have an unsubscribe link at the bottom of the emails you are receiving. Go ahead and click that and it will stop.

  2. ci abate says:

    Use or non-use of the long putter should be left to golfer and not the USGA. There was no ban on graphite shafts or oversized heads but people switched to them because they helped them play better.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      ci abate,
      Thanks ci for the blog post. I agree with you, but also remember that they are not banning the putter, but the anchoring of the putter. You will still be able to use the long putter and don’t worry…golf companies are coming out with a putter that will anchor to the forearm which is legal.
      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  3. J gruidl says:

    Hi. I have essential tremors in my left hand try putting with your left hand shaking. That is real hard I was a good putter with the short putter but the tremors will not let me putt that way anymore what should I do.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      J Gruidl,
      Thanks J for the blog post. I suggest going to a belly putter or a long putter and anchor the putter to your body. This is still legal for 3 more years and within that time they will be coming up with putters that will allow you to anchor the putter to your left forearm and other things that will help skate the line of anchoring. Oddly enough my dentist hands shake as well and I discussed this with him. He said that it doesn’t effect him with his practice because he anchors his hand when he is doing dental work. We switched him to a belly putter and it made a tremendous difference. Let’s just say I did this before the member guest tournament and the rest of the members were ready to lynch him after he played so well.
      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  4. David Wilson says:

    The PGA, Champions, and LPGA tours don’t have to go by USGA rules if they don’t want to. They differ on other rules such as the embedded ball rule. They would only have to comply if it is a USGA run tournament such as the US Open or British Open. I think if the Champions Tour goes to the ban the careers of Bernhart Langer, Freddie Couples, Peter Senior, and many others are over. Even on the PGA Tour there are players like Bradley, Simpson, and others who will not putt as well as they do now and may even not play well enough to keep their cards. This has happened before when the crocquette stroke was banned.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      David Wilson,
      Thanks David for the blog post and you are correct. The tours could adopt a local rule and allow the long or belly anchoring stroke. Remember the USGA is not banning the putters, but the anchoring of the putters. The PGA Tour could really take a lot of power away from the USGA by allowing it, but I don’t think it will do that. Thanks again for the post and keep in touch.
      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

    • Larry Boggs says:

      David, you are correct. Those pro’s career would not be as good. That is the whole point. We armatures have the GHIN and handicaps to make the filed more even because of different skills. The pro tour is not built on that premise. It is built on who plays the best on their skills. If their putting is a problem, practice more don’t get something that fixes the problem.

  5. I use a broomstick putter due to age & a bad back.I have found that I can practice putting with it for lengthy periods.I cant do this with the short stick. AS a result I putt much better. If there is any advantage with the long broomstick club I think it is being enabled to practice without back pain for longer periods.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      JOhn Smith Sydney Australia,
      thanks John for the blog post. I appreciate you writing in and I agree with you. I also want to add that when you have something new to work on or experiment with that your practice becomes more fun. After having worked on my swing for years it sort of added quality practice to my daily practice. I firmly believe that this is one reason why Tiger has changed his swing so many times. It is a challenge to master making these swing changes and it does make practice more fun. I know for me when I wasn’t working on my swing hitting balls became tedious after awhile and to consider the amount of balls Tiger hits I can’t help but think that may be the reason why he has changed.
      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  6. Martin Lincberg says:

    Well gentleman, glad to see that longer clubs are “against the spirit of the game”. A couple of hundred years ago they played the game here in U.K. with feather filled balls and hickory sticks, should we stick to the spirit of the game, No. You cannot stop progress or the game will die. Everything finds it’s own level. Throw away you mobile phones and computers, forget about Kindles and let’s go back to gas lighting.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Martin Lincberg,
      Thanks Martin for the blog post. I couldn’t agree with you more. Keep in touch. I am heading across the pond in September of 2013. I will be doing some golf schools over there. Hope to see you then.
      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  7. Rik Clarke says:

    I would like to make an analogy. Let’s say that Luke Donald, one of the best, but not longest players in the world, finds out that not only is he longer, but more accurate with a 54″ driver. He is not allowed to take advantage of this “new technology”, but, should he be? No. He must learn to play the game with the same equipment everyone else uses, and to make adjustments according to his physical abilities.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Rik Clarke,
      Thanks Rik for the blog post. That is a great analogy about the length of the driver. The USGA only restricted the length of the driver 4,5, or 6 years ago so I understand what your saying. Thanks for taking the time to write in.
      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  8. JIM JANSEN says:

    Why not use technology to the full extent? In my opinion,they should be concerned with maintaining a level playing field and not try to regulate technique or technology improvements. If everyone has the same opportunity, what is the issue. In almost every other endeavor, paradigm shifts are desired, the better mouse trap is the pot at the end of the rainbow. Golf is an applied science and an art, let’s allow true creativity to thrive.

    • R Hedley says:

      My firm opinion is that anchoring a club on the body is against the principle of golf and does give an advantage to the user. In my amateur club poor putters have gained considerbly by anchoring and have success mainly by reason of the technique. Good putters have no need to change.
      I am convinced however that a much better solution would be to limit the length of clubs such that anchoring would be not practicable. This would be entirely within the spirit of golf over the years.

      • CJ Goecks says:

        R Hedley,
        Thanks R for the blog post. I agree that this method has improved people’s putting, but is it because they changed their mindset, gave them reason to practice, made practice fun, or was it simply the stroke is far superior. I don’t feel it the stroke is far superior and that is my point. I think the other external factors is why they improve. I like your point on limiting length of the clubs, but maybe the USGA is not trying to hurt manufacturers and still allowing people to use the longer putter, but not anchor it.
        Keep em Long and Straight,
        CJ

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Jim Jansen,
      Thanks Jim for the blog post and I agree with you. Ultimately it comes down to the player. Phil Mickelson has been regarded as one of the best putters and he went to the belly putter, but came back. I think it helps some, but it doesn’t mean it improves their technique or gives them an unfair advantage.
      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  9. Troy Vayanos says:

    I’ve never been a fan of the longer putters but I would like to say this.

    The facts remain that ‘anchoring’ does not provide an advantage. If this were the case then every professional on tour would be using them. In fact none of the users are in the top statistics in putting?

    My issue is that this ban is some 30 years too late. The other issue is that bringing it in 2016 is too far away. It should have been brought in for the 2013 season.

    Already we have seen Keegan Bradley over the weekend get heckled by a spectator over it. I’m sure we’re bound to see more over the coming months.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Troy Vayanos,
      Thanks Troy for the blog post. I agree with you, but the 2013 year wouldn’t happen due to the rule book changes every 4 years. I wrote an article coming out in the next few days about how I feel the game is changing in regards to the etiquette and that the USGA and each person should take responsibility for this. The fact that spectators are heckling others is the biggest change in golf. Soon golf will be dominated by the little league dads and the integrity of golf will be changed forever.
      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  10. Tom F says:

    Let’s see, my elbow and forearm can be against … something, but my forearm and wrist? ..
    Where the heck are those pictures again?!
    Oh yeah, it has to be “intentionally”
    This should be fun

  11. Ron Boivin says:

    I am glad the USGA and the RCGA banned the belly putter but I don`t know way the ban has to be 2016 why not next year do these players need 3 years to ajust they change equipment every year.I am not a big fan of Keegan Bradley or Webb Simpson they both take too long to address and hit their ball so I can hardly wait to see how these players do and others without anchoring a putter.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Ron Bolvin,
      Thanks Ron for the blog post. When they banned square grooves it only took a year at most, but it coincided with the rules book change. In other words they update the rules every 4 years so I think it had something to do with that, plus they were trying to be politically correct. They knew there would be backlash from this so they kicked the can down the road for someone else to deal with it. Sounds like our government. We can see how much gets done with them so I guess the USGA and R&A are learning from them. uh oh.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

    • Don Corby says:

      Ron
      read your rule book. the only changes in the 37 rules of golf occur every 4 years. then you, like the other commentors, will understand why they waited until 2016.

  12. Robert says:

    IMHO Whether there is a provable advantage or not in anchoring a long putter is irrelevant. This is not an argument over advantages of technology, but simply trying to preserve what constiutes a free stroke…am I wrong here? Some here are making it sound like we are comparing cavity back and blade irons and determining who has the advantage. Theorectically, if you are a pure ball striker, and use blades, you have an advantage in “working the ball”. If you are not a pure striker, and you use cavity back for “forgiveness” this could also be considered an advantage. Remember Larry Laoretti? Didn’t he use a BELLY putter WITOUHT anchoring it when he WON the 1992 U.S. Senior Open?

  13. Well, I did try a long putter and just don’t adjusted to it. However, there is no logical reason for the anchoring ban. As mentioned before, if it is so good why is that not every player shifted to the long putter? however, it does bring confort for elder players that will avoid bending so much and hurt their backs. USGA/R&A should be more sensitive on the issue and release the use for the senior golfers. The other important question is indeed the release that should be granted to all players when their ball lies in a divot (specially one that has not been repaired or fill in with sand). It is unfair and against the spirit of a fair game.

  14. Don Corby says:

    CJ
    I ue a belly putter, I do NOT think it gives me any advantage over “conventional” length utters when playing golf, but at my ages (79) it sure the h… gives me an advantage when on the practice green. Before I changed after 10 minutes of putting practice, my back hurt like h… With the belly putter, I can practice 3-4 times longer. That not the anchoring is what gives me an advantage with the belly putter

    Now, here is my thoughts about the dictators, oops, directors of the USGA/R&A. I seriously doubt that they received messages from the inventors the game. After all, that was 800 or so years ago. Do they know even if they had putters, All of the evidence known indicate they used their shepherd crooks to hit a rock. No hole early that came along later. We do not know if they “anchored ” or not. Picture of shepherds suggest that they held their crooks with some kind of anchoring. Therefore, that the ruing bodies have proposed this change :per dictum” with no scientific evidence or research. “WE think that “anchoring” is bad for the spirit and intent of the game. I doubt that a bunch of prominent volunteer business leaders and Dukes and Lords from the British Isles actually have any more knowledge of what is “Good for the Game” as far as equipment than you or I do They do have the power, and that is what counts. I have been a member of the USGA for over 50 years. I do not like this ruling,an I will reserve my decision regarding my future membership until a final decision later this year. I hope other user of belly putters and “broomstick” will consider doing the same. This is the most powerful action we have against his arbitrary decision

    CJ. II would appreciate you and anyone else responding to these comments

  15. Why doesn’t the Golfing Bodies concern themselves with more important issues such as slow play. The enforcement of the slow play rule is a joke. Also, a divot should be declared ground under repair and a one club free drop should be allowed.

  16. Hi CJ: Thanks for the opportunity to comment. I must say my game has improved thanks to your easy to follow instructions and in particular the DVD’s series which I found very helpful. In regards to the banning of putter anchoring I can not say because I have not tried it nor do I want to as I am very happy with my putting with the traditional and standard putter. I believe that to a certain point new technology should be allowed to enter the game and obviously it may or may not be an advantage as it is an individual thing. It take time and practice to perform whether it is anchoring or traditional. Unlike the dressing code which over the years was allowed had been relaxed to limitation. But I could not imagine playing with jacket and tie because I feel one would be restricted (tangled) in the swinging of a club. So in essence you could say I am not here nor there in agreement but a good example is our Adam Scott whom did take awhile before he could use anchoring. I don’t believe anything comes natural and that includes putting. Every movement must be practice. So if it is beneficial to our health then by all means it should be allowed to stay other wise it would be a question of prefer options. After all there are hundred of different styles. Are we going to ban the lot? and Every one plays the same style and one only putter?

    Keep up your good work CJ
    Regards
    Carlos from (down under), Australia

  17. Mark says:

    I think it is important to differentiate the ban is not on the club, it is on the anchoring. And I agree that the club should not be anchored.

    I could be wrong, but I remember the Broomstick putters being used without the anchoring that people use today. Clear of the chin, and away from the chest. It has only been in the last 10-15 years or so that I seem to recall the top hand coming in much closer to the chest or under the chin.

    Although the more I think of the reasons for this, it may be due to golfers being more athletic these days. Golfer today have 6-pack Abs and a Broomstick putter can fall straight down. 10+ years ago, some of the Broomstick players I can recall had a fair beer belly.

    Note: I have no idea how to not anchor a belly putter?!? :)

  18. Geoff W says:

    I find this whole argument intriguing. As you have alluded why hasn’t every golfer, pro and amateur alike switched to the long putter if it was so advantageous.I just dont get waht they are trying to achive. Seems typical of beauroracy mucking around because they can which helops justify their existence. Now that is the way of the world.

  19. Rod Rosso says:

    I must say that i feel for the pro who has played for years with the long stick,and think a grandfathers rights should be invoked,say if you have used a long putter over 5 years professioaly,then keep it i think the youngsters have time to change there preferance and become proficient.

  20. Fred DeRossett says:

    C.J., I didn’t care for the idea of the long putter when it was first introduced, and I still don’t. I tried a few and was not impressed. A few of my golf buddies added them to their bags, but if they improved their putting, it was minimal.
    I have used a Lynx Transmitter now for oveer 20 years, same putter, same shaft. I wouldn’t trade it for any other putter I’ve ever tried or seen. I can see how the long putter might be a help to any golfer who has begun to get a little “shaky” in his hands, but otherwise, I don’t think it offers any advantage. The old saying that you must “Like your driver and love your putter,” is, I believe, the key. If you can’t out putt me with a standard putter, I doubt you’ll out putt me with a belly putter. In the end, it all comes down wo touch, feel and stability. I say, if a golfer needs the extra (perceived) stability, let him. It will not affect my game, either way.

  21. Terry says:

    Don’t wait so long due it next year

  22. Kirk Galbraith says:

    Controlling ones nerves and hands are apart of the athleticism of the game. Anchoring the putter alleviates the need for that control, thus giving an unfare advantage to the one using it. CJ, the reason Steve Stricker does not use the anchored putter is because he believes it gives the player an UNFARE ADVANTAGE, thus it is contrary to the spirit/athleticism of the game.

  23. Bob Cadman says:

    I think many players who found that the long putter stoke helped with conquering the yips will get frustrated and quit the game. I think it is harder to judge the force of the stroke with an anchored long putter. I feel that shorter putters are an advantage to getting the correct weight of a putt.
    Golfing regulatory bodies are absolutely anal with new rules. Keep those rules coming. I’ll just play my game and completely forget about competing with anyone except the golf course and my last round. Wearing sunglasses might give an unfair advantage as well. High quality golf shoes may give an advantage over cheaper ones. Maybe we should play in bare feet.
    If the option is there for everyone what is the problem???????? I think steel and graphite shafts definitely gave far more of an advantage over hickory than a long anchored putter does over a short one. They definitely play more of a role in causing courses to become too short and outdated for traditional golf.

  24. Neil Harrison says:

    I got a Sam Torrance putter over 20 years ago and would never return to a small putter. I fought the yips for 5 years and was about to stop playing the game of golf as it would have affected my health. However after playing the long putter, I was back enjoying my golf again and play by anchoring my left hand against my chest and rocking my shoulders (as I did with a small putter)I will continue to putt this way and may have to modify where I have my left hand, but what a nonsense after this period of time, and I defy anyone to tell me that the claw grip looks like a natural putting stroke!!

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Neil Harrison,
      Thanks Neil for the blog post. I hope it works out for you and you figure out a different way to putt. Best wishes.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

      • Peter Astor says:

        Technology and time change everything. Tennis has gotten easier through technology – as a result, more people are playing it at a higher level, and attendance at premier events has never been larger. The reactionaries at the USGA believe they are acting in the best interest of the game, but they are not. They are thwarting the democratization of the game when they dictate how swings should be made, and how clubs and balls should be manufactured. If they want more people participating, help to speed play, help amateurs golf better, and allow good ideas to flourish. Yes, there is only one way to play – honestly.

        • CJ Goecks says:

          Peter Astor,
          Thanks for the blog post Peter. You have said it perfectly. I do agree with the USGA on limiting equipment other wise you would never see the end to the improvement in technology and the distance people would be hitting it. Also the ball and how much straighter it goes has brought a lot of people into the game, but their has to be some limitation.
          Keep em Long and Straight,
          CJ

  25. Noel Minihan says:

    Hi CJ. I agree with you on many things in relation to golf. However, I strongly disagree with you on the anchored putter. I do think it gives golfers an advantage.
    Also, it looks woeful. Look at Adam Scott, a beautiful swinger of club. I could watch him all day hitting irons or woods. Then he gets to putting. I have to turn away. It’s truly an abomination.
    I congratulate the R&A and USGA; better late than never!
    Keep up the good work CJ.
    Noel.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Noel Minihan,
      Thanks Noel for the blog post. I tried the long putter because it supposedly does give you an advantage, but after 42 putts at Augusta I vowed never to go back LOL. Like I said I felt I made some good putts, but did not see the advantage. Again if someone says it is an advantage and is not using it then that doesn’t make sense. If Tiger thought it was such an advantage then he should of switched and he may have Jack’s record by now. No one would fault Tiger if he switched and got the record. there would be no asterisk next to his record stating he used a long putter to set the record. We all saw Tiger’s putting woes the last few years. Again I don’t really have a personal stake in this and am so so on the ruling, but if it helps keep people in the game than that is what I care about. Best wishes Noel and no hard feelings.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  26. Lou Kasitz says:

    I totally disagree with the ruling. If it is that important why did they wait so long. And if some players think it has an advantage, they probably are not using it because it feels uncomfortable to them. So why penalize the guys who can use it. They should be looking at the ball configurations and do something about that. You would see less 325 drives and more of the working of the ball like they did years ago. R&A and USGA are so far behind the times, it is not fair to the players.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Lou Kasitz,
      Thanks Lou for the blog post. I’m with you on the ball, but then the USGA would have to come in and regulate course designers because the courses now are too long if they roll back the ball lol. No easy choices I guess.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  27. Jim says:

    I do not use a long putter. I agree that the integrity of the grand old game should be maintained however having said that for the joe average golfer like me the advancements in technology have helped to make the game more enjoyable. I play with a fellow that uses the long stick and never felt it gave him an advantage over me. Putting is 90 percentent mental.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Jim,
      Thanks for taking the time to write in. I agree with you. I think the biggest issue here is the PGA is trying to make the game more fun and keep people around with programs like “tee it forward” and the idea of having games with the hole bigger etc. The PGA and the local PGA pro’s are the ones in contact with day to day golfers and they recognize the importance of keeping people in the game and making the game more fun. I understand the USGA has a different purpose, but i think they would agree that keeping the game fun and enjoyable is also their purpose.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  28. David Ward says:

    I agree with you CJ. The decision and relevant comments in this blog to eliminate the long putter from the game are only based on emotion and tradition – there is no proof offered to support the claim that the long putter provides an unfair advantage. The nature of the game is changing from the traditional and restricted, to one that all can play – the rules and equipment should and will adjust accordingly, as in most other sports. One thing is for sure, us non-professionals who use the long putter will not be giving it up.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      David Ward,
      Thanks David for the blog post. Here is one case I would like to see the PGA Tour come up with a local rule and not ban the anchoring rule. It won’t happen but could you imagine the uproar and transfer of power from the USGA and R&A to the PGA Tour that would happen. I could hear people now…If the tour players can use it and we can’t then I am going to use it. Most tournaments would adopt local rules that state PGA Tour rules govern and no longer would we see USGA rules govern play.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  29. Alberto says:

    Is it right or wrong to ban this putting style/stroke? Ultimatley it doesn’t matter simply because as of 2016 the anchoring is banned. Period.

    On the positive side, it still means you CAN use the belly and broom-handle putters, you just have to stroke it differently. A case in point is Angel Cabrera and the way he uses the belly putter. Maybe we will see other players changing to this???

    One thing which astounds me, however, is the total lack of centre shafted mallet putters on the worldwide Tours. This is something I have been using for 2 years now and my putting has gotten better as a result, especially when combined with a larger grip. It almost seems too easy. So who knows, maybe this will now take off.

    Finally thanks CJ for some very insightful videos, they are truly excellent!! BTW, my chipping has improved enormously as a result of practicing your tips, so too my pitching, with the L-to-L being a true revelation nad proves you don’t always need a full blown out swing ot achieve great results. Also the L-to-L provides me with excellent control plus something else which you need out there on the course – confidence. My handicap is now going down, down, down. So many, many thanks once again. Keep up the great work.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Alberto,
      Great point buddy and thanks for the blog post. I love this subject just because it is so debatable. I could take either side just to be a pain in the butt lol. Thanks for the kind words and I truly appreciate the fact that you have trusted me with your golf game. I take no greater joy than helping people. I really appreciate it sir. Best wishes.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  30. Mike Gardner says:

    The “horse is out of the barn” with so many in the game around the world using the long putter. So the ruling is far too late in time. In addition, the ruling will be too difficult to administer during a round of golf both in amateur and professional play! Can you imagine Johnny Miller looking at replays saying on the air “I think the judges missed that one as he clearly anchored the putter on that stroke”. Yike, the rules committee is out of control and someone should think about replacing its leader(s).

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Mike Gardner,
      Thanks Mike for the blog post. I didn’t even think of this idea about Johnny Miller. Maybe we could instill the red flag instant replay rule lol.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  31. Angela Kiddell says:

    Hi, Being a 68ish lady golfer that loves to play competively against either men or women, I agree with the ruling to an extent, why not allow it to stand in the amateur golf world, this will older players an extention of the abilitiy to play but, ban it in the professional game.
    Angela

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Angela Kiddell,
      Thanks Angela for the blog post. I appreciate you taking the time to write in. This is a popular debate, but one that opens up a can of worms in my opinion. I agree with you, but then you are competing against others in local competitions and on the course and they have different rules than you. You bring up a good point and I can’t really argue other than the fact that we are not competing on level rules then.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  32. Rickey Peltier says:

    I think that the R&A has lost it’s nerve. There has been talk about banning long putters for a couple of years now. You hear it every week on the tour from the color announcers. People talk about it on the course. You read about it in every golf article that’s available. So why do I think the R&A has lost it’s nerves? Because they didn’t ban the long putter! They only caved in to the week ones. How could they? Could they tell someone who is 7’2″ that they are only allowed to use a 34″ shafted putter. Or maybe a short person is required to use the 34″er. Why not just ban club fitting for all of us! While they’re at it, let’s ban the use of golf shoes. I think players also have an unfair advantage to improve their grip by using two golf gloves! Sorry “two glove” Gainey! You won this year, so the R&A will have it in for you within the next couple of years. Here’s a really good one for the R&A. During pick and clean conditions, you have to hit the fairway first. I think that’s unfair for the small percentage of us who don’t hit the fairway. So what am I getting at? Every person who has played our beloved game has tinkered here or there with their swing and equipment, so who is the R&A to make such a ruling! Get a life. Wake up and smell the coffee. These players don’t have an unfair advantage! If the do, ban the long putter, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY! Don’t know about you, but I love this game. But I have the feeling that the R&A is turning into a bunch Dictators! Get some nads and do the right thing. It’s now or never!!!!!!

    P.S. I too tried the belly putter. I also did well with it, at least for a couple of months. But in the long run, I went back to my extreeeeemly large headed Ping putter. I guess I’ll have to polish up my 40 year old “Bulls Eye”, just in case.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Rickey Peltier,
      LOL Rickey, I am not arguing with you. Very heated debate. Maybe your large headed Ping putter should be banned…too great of MOI lol. JK best wishes buddy.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  33. David M. says:

    Anchoring in Putting is foreign to all the other clubs and shots in golf. Great and long overdue decision. Otherwise where would this end, next thing we would have pitching clubs using anchoring. Golf is also a game of great traditions. Putting like all other strokes was always, for centuries, with two hands gripping the club and unattached to the body.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      david M,
      Thanks DAvid for the blog post. I agree with tradition but again this has been around for almost 100 years now. That is the main point of them banning this now.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  34. HB says:

    One should wonder about “advantages” on the professional tour. Does one golf ball give a player an advantage over another? That’s the hype we observe in the marketing campaigns of every single golf equipment manufacturer. The fact is, any advantage of one brand over another is miniscule because the manufacture of equipment must conform to the standards established by the USGA and R&A. So too should USGA and R&A regulate how the equipment is to be used on the golf course. If the associations are able to proscribe the grounding clubs within a hazard area, then they are also empowered to ban anchoring long putters to the body. I’m not even sure why this is an issue to begin with. If people who are using the long putter regard themselves at a disadvantage not being allowed to anchor it, then it is possible those people aren’t the PGA professional they think they are.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      HB,
      I think the idea is again the belief that it helps. It breeds confidence. I don’t think it is an advantage but again are we regulating technology or players. Can they say you cant be in top physical shape either. I again have no personal stake in it but it is fun to debate.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  35. Hi CJ, who is right and who is wrong will never be agreed upon, everyone has their own thoughts on these putters.
    I personally agree with the ruling. My thoughts are that by anchoring one is eliminating movements in the hands and arms and forces you too just use your shoulders as it should be, thus eliminating other factors to come into play.
    I like to keep the game on an even level, everyone the same.
    These are just my thoughts, and I appreciate you allowing me to voice my opinion.
    Keep up the great work, CJ, we all love you, you break the game down so nice and make it very easy to understand.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Robert Billardo,
      Thanks Robert for the blog post. Great points you bring up and i am glad you have voiced your opinion. I only wish I had this many people writing in daily all the time. Of course my fingers would fall off replying to everyone. I personally want to reply to everyone and it does take time, but I really enjoy it and love all of my students also. Please keep in touch.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  36. kramy drah says:

    The fact is money talks & B-S walks. This ruling means that millions of putters will be set aside for new ones. Without this ruling I personally – never (yes never) would buy a new one.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      kramy drah,
      Thanks for the blog post. Technology is pretty much set with putters. I did talk to the Nike rep the other day and they have some funky looking putters that they say helps with the yips and other things. It was an eye opening discussion. the problem was the look but I wouldn’t give up on new putters just yet.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  37. Reg says:

    My father was a Pro in Melbourne during the 30/40’s, an excellent putter with a hickory shafted mallet-head and conventional action. At 14 he had me playing off 3 and at 70 I can still play to it. However, my putting has always been a challenge but I found that by anchoring my Left Bicep/Elbow against the body, strengthening the Forearm and Wrist with a shoulders-only action, the putter-head could not wander well… not as much anyway. So should this method be banned too? After all with the ‘Broomstick’ it’s the Left Hand that’s anchored not the putter! Also anchoring a longer putter to the stomach area activates the hips/knees which for me could never be an advantage!

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Reg,
      Thanks Reg for the question. Again this is some of the arguments. I think it opens up some interpretations but again why now are they banning this after 100 years.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  38. tiger though he was geting to much compition do the pga ex. play golf if they did they would know it dosent make a diff. but to many people csay it dosent look like golf have they seen 2 gloves yet…bob

  39. Grady says:

    I agree with you. I said many times that if a belly or other anchored putter gave you an advantage EVERY professional golfer would switch – especially with millions of prize money and promotional deals on the line. I think they are nuts.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Grady,
      Exactly. Great point. If the pro switched and had a blow out year then maybe they would sign with Nike for 10 years 250 million. Not a bad reason to switch if it truly was an advantage.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  40. Peter Mueller says:

    I agree with you, C.J. I do not think that the anchoring gives the player an advantage. As you rightly point out, everybody can change, if they feel like it. I changed my grip about two years ago, because my putting swing was out of order. Since then my putting has improved. One day they may even regulate the grip. This is how you hinder progress. Sad!

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Peter Mueller,
      Thanks Peter for the blog post. The grip regulation may be coming next lol.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  41. Ron Knox says:

    I wonder if Sam Snead ( who suffered the eternal long-suffering disease of the terrible “yips”) would have found anchoring the putter helpful. You bring your emotions, etc. to the game and try to tame such malady by practice, etc. and, how about the ban on putting with the ball between your feet upon stroke. I believe some of the pros did so,until it was banned as “unfair”.

    I am in favor of banning anchoring. In a nutshell, you battle your demons on the green like everyone else.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Ron Knox,
      I agree you battle your demons on the green like everyone else, but does the long putter give you an advantage with that or does it simply give you a different method that changes your mindset. Is it the putter or the mind change…same as different grip.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  42. David says:

    It doesn’t look like a golf club. You hold the club like a croquet mallet when that instrument is used in the sideways position as opposed to the through the legs position which is banned in golf. We should limit the technology as we do in all sports so that the game doesn’t change too much. We should try to stop big business from ruining the game. Golf is not about manufacturers making money by creating endless variations on equipment. The game is the thing – in essence using the natural contours that occur in some favoured spots to make a game that gets the ball into the hole over varied terrain; a way of enjoying nature obliquely, as happens also with fishing, which is much more effective than contemplating nature head on.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      David,
      Thanks DAvid for the blog post. Keep in touch and thanks for taking the time to write in.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  43. David says:

    It doesn’t look like a golf club. You hold the club like a croquet mallet when that instrument is used in the sideways position as opposed to the through the legs position which is banned in golf. We should limit the technology as we do in all sports so that the game doesn’t change too much. We should try to stop big business from ruining the game. Golf is not about manufacturers making money by creating endless variations on equipment. The game is the thing – in essence using the natural contours that occur in some favoured spots to make a game that gets the ball into the hole over varied terrain; a way of enjoying nature obliquely, as happens also with fishing, which is much more effective than contemplating nature head on.

    a

  44. BetteQ says:

    Hi CJ:

    My version of putting with the belly putter is to the players advantage. I heard that Fred Couples uses the long stick, but does not anchor it to his body and I think that’s the way it will go. Use the long putter, but don’t touch your body.

    Bette

    • CJ Goecks says:

      BetteQ,
      Thanks for the blog post BetteQ. I think these players will find ways to make it work and definitely some will go this route. We will see in the future.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  45. stewart rodgers says:

    Disagree with you entirely. The putting stroke should not be bastardised by anchoring in any way, shape or form.
    It was designed to be a pure stroke as are all other strokes associated with the game, to be successfully completed through perfect hand, eye, muscle coordination.( rather simplistic view, but sufficient to make my point).
    I wouldn’t care if you were Ernie Els or Keegan Bradley, if you stepped on the tee with me sporting a long or belly putter then I would consider you obtaining an advantage over me as a purist depending solely on my ability to carry out the putting stroke as was meant. I also agree in curtailing advances in technology to minimise the distance the ball can be hit before they make obsolete or a mockery of most of the beautiful courses in this world.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Stewart Rodgers,
      Thanks Stewart for your blog post and your point of view. The differences in opinion is what makes this such a great and heated topic. No hard feelings. Best wishes and keep in touch.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  46. kevin says:

    i actually think it is unfair to the younger players , who like you have stated , have been taught from a young age to use the belly or long putter , they have never done anything illegal or wrong but are now being unfairly punished .
    i myself switch between the belly and broomstick as my putting was driving me to insanity , i was a 10-11 marker and would more often than not have at least 5-6 3 putts a round while also missing good birdie chances , now i have switched and i am down to 7 , it has literally kept me playing because i was ready to give it up in frustration

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Kevin,
      Thanks Kevin for the blog post. I understand your point and that is the main reason why I think banning the anchoring is bad. Golf is hard enough and if it keeps you in the game and keeps you playing then that is why they should not ban the putter. The long putter did not make you a tour player, but allowed you to enjoy this GAME. it is a game in fact.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  47. Barry says:

    RULES ARE RULES.
    BE A BIG GUY AND LIVE WITH THEM.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Barry,
      Thanks Barry for the blog post. I will live with the rules and like I said it doesn’t effect me. I don’t use a long or belly putter, but again don’t feel it is an advantage. My point is to continue to grow the game. This decision won’t effect me either way.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  48. Jack Bergen says:

    The belly putter and the long putter are not the major profit of any major manufacturer. The USGA has allowed changes in clubs from head size, changing from wood shafts & heads, the tradition of apparel, and more. All of these changes have profited major companies millions of dollars. Changing the anchoring will not harm the profits of any company as they will simply develop “the next great putter” we all must have and the profits go on. You are right that changing ones grip can add confidence just as the claw grip or the reverse grip has done for others. I anchor my putter with a special style I developed using a regular size putter and I have gone from a 2-3 stroke putter to a 2-1 stroke putter on average. I am still an average player and can be beaten consistently by my brother-in-law and others, but anchoring my regular putter has just made me feel better about my better mediocre game.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Jack Bergen,
      Thanks Jack for the blog post. Your right about long putters not being a major revenue source for these companies. I wonder if they will not allow you to anchor the putter against your wrist. That seems like it could be the next trend.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  49. Christopher says:

    I think that the ban by the authorities is justified. The advantage of anchoring is not felt immediately but as one get used to the feeling it does create an advantage. It is often taken up by professionals who have failed to master the traditional stroke not those who feels that they can better them.

    However, I feel that the long putter users kill the enthusiasm for their uses themselves. It disgusted me to see a long putter user immediately pull this “club” out for their free 2 stroke drop. A long putter?; this is supposed to be the shortest club in the bag. I think that this drop rule should also be changed and the measure should be the length of the club to be used on the next stroke.

    The other reason for banning the club surely will be to discourage any more “inventions” that will flout more fair play? What next? A telescopic club? Or maybe one that have a fold out that could be anchored (spiked) to the ground for added stability?

    I do think that the bodies have failed to stamp their authority on the game once and for all and will have more headache later on. Why not make the game such that every stroke must be made with the hands not more than 3 inches apart without touching any other part of the body? This will take care of tradition, long putters and such.

    Your thoughts?

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Christopher,
      Thanks Christopher for the blog post. I am not sure if anchoring is an advantage, but again it has helped resurge players careers and kept people playing the game. I agree with you on the two club rule using this putter. That is definitely an unfair advantage over players that do not use a long putter. I think this rule should be changed immediately. This is always the problem with lift clean and place and why the officals hate to do this. It does create a bit of cheating. They have banned the putter and so we must live by it. I think this does stop or limit future inventions that may have truly effected the game. Thanks for your blog post and you have a lot of great points.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  50. William Hamilton says:

    My involvement with golf goes back to 1946 when as an 11 year old, I strugggled with a bag of someone elses clubs around 18 holes as a caddie. Have never used a long putter or a belly putter and have a putting stance that is weird as can be that works for me. I agree with you CJ would concede no advantage to anyone due to the stick they use on the green, as I believe putting to be 90% between the ears.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      William Hamilton,
      Thanks William for the blog post. Great points. Please keep in touch.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

      • Ross Seip says:

        If anchoring the putter is not according to the rules then ban it now for the 2013 season. Most pros change their putters on a regular basis anyway. Some have tried anchoring the putter and it did not work for them. I say you should be able to use the kind of putter that gives you the confidence to make the put.

        • CJ Goecks says:

          Ross Seip,
          Thanks Ross for the blog post. I agree with you on the choice of putters, but as for the timing I think it has to do with the Rules of Golf that they update every four years. With such a controversial and heated debate also this gives people plenty of time to make the change, although most will not change until the very last minute.

          Keep em Long and Straight,
          CJ

  51. Jimmy Sturla says:

    I have never liked the belly putter myself, but for those older players up in their 50′s and 60′s that can’t bend over as much as us younger players can the belly putter provides comfort to them. So a ban to all players is too big if a step. If they want to ban the belly putter ban it to anyone who can still bend over past 90 degrees not to all players of this game. I know a lot of older players who don’t go out and play golf like they used to because it hurts their backs to play. Their backs don’t hurt from the full swing but from bending over to putt. So the ban is good for professional players so that everyone is using the same equipment but don’t ban it from the older players who can’t use regular putters anymore that’s just rediculous.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Jimmy Sturia,
      Thanks Jimmy for the blog post. Remember they are not banning the length of the putter, but the anchoring of the long putters. I think that many players will still use these but will have to alter the anchoring.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  52. Michael Lutvey says:

    Hi CJ,

    This potential rule change could force me out of golf. My dad and great grandad have shaky hands. I have unfortunately got the same affliction. If I cannot use the long putter I might have to quit as I am struggling to sink short putts because of this. It is not fun for me and I know the long putter will help me as I have already tested it!

    • CJ Goecks says:

      michael lutvey,
      Thanks Michael for the blog post. Remember they are banning the anchoring of these putters…not the putter. I am sure some players will come up with ways to putt and not anchor it so try that before giving up the game. Besides you have three years. you may become a great putter by then. Find out what your weaknesses are and maybe with improved mechanics you won’t have these problems. Have you seen my putting DVD? it may help you and if it doesn’t you get your money back. Let me know your thoughts.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  53. Chris Blaschka says:

    I 100% agree with CJ. It is an inconsistant and weird decision. If I would be Peterson, I would sue them!

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Chris Blaschka,
      Thanks Chris for the blog post. A lawsuit would be interesting. Maybe it could be a Ping thing.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  54. Jim Murray says:

    The biggest problem with professional golf today is the slowness of play, the anchor putters are contributing factor in that. Are they an advantage, yes, if you can read greens correctly. As they contribute to a truer strike of the ball. It also takes out of the equation the dominance of trailing hand/arm, Just like the claw grip. Steve Stricker doesn’t have to switch because he has mastered the shorter putter which enables him to have a better feel. The anchor putters make ordinary golfers into better players, and the more success they have on the greens using this method, the more confident they become, the better they play. But remember golf was never meant to be easy, but golf is big business and big bucks flows into the golf industry, and any advantage that is perceived is believed. There is, nowadays, no such thing as a level playing field, just another way of playing sub par golf.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Jim Murray,
      Thanks Jim for the blog post. Just like you are coming up with reasons for its success is why people have used them. It creates a belief. I don’t personally think it does create an advantage, but it will give people a reason for believing. Some people want the ball under the left eye because you can hit the putt on the upswing and gets truer roll. Others want the ball under the middle of your eyes because it is the low point of the stroke and you can repeat it. Who is correct? It is your belief. The long putter does not make everyone a better player. To say everyone that uses a longer putter is better is not true. I also do not understand your statement of being a level playing field in golf. Please explain.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  55. dobbo says:

    I have had heaps of chemotherapy and it has left me with shaky hands. I still play club golf (without a long putter) and it is sometimes is annoying trying to keep the putter head square through impact. I have been thinking that a belly or long putter might help, it is now out of my hands!!!!!! I also play with a couple of people with Parkinsons disease who use long putters and I can swear that they do not show any advantage on the greens . It is not the club that makes the difference it is how the player uses it. A few wins by players using long putters does not compare with the hundreds of wins by people using conventional putters. Commercial Albury Veteran Golfers President

    • CJ Goecks says:

      dobbo,
      Thanks Dobbo for the blog post. maybe the governing bodies that run the handicapped tournaments will allow the longer putters for these people. I like your points. Keep in touch.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  56. john says:

    I personally agree with you how you swing a club shouldn’t matter.
    Neither should anchoring. Is it any different then when they outlawed Sammy Snead from straddling the putter?

  57. Dave says:

    I think the the anchor putter provides an obvious advantage…it’s ANCHORED!! Players like Steve Stricker should be upset about tour players using the anchor putter. The reason is, if all the tour players used the conventional length putters, Stricker has a huge advantage…because he is one of the best putters in the world using the conventional putter. I think all the players using the anchor putter putt very similar…which is much better then they would putt if they were using conventional putters…they also make a lot more pressure putts. If all the pros used the anchor putter, it would take away the advantage of the great putters…the players who know how to use touch and feel and have nerves of steel. The anchor putter is just another way of taking skill of the game…similar to the newer drivers and golf balls. I believe the pros using the anchor putter have been picking the pockets of the pros behind them on the money list. But since it has been legal you can’t blame anyone from using the putters. That being said, I say good riddance to the anchor putter.

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Dave,
      thanks for the blog post. This will be interesting to see after the ban takes effect. Watching players like Keegan and others after the ban will be telling on this issue.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  58. Shawn Noack says:

    Hi,
    I agree! I can’t see that the long putter adds advantage… I’ve messed around with them on the practice green and whilst short putts ok long putts felt awkward.
    Like you say technology needs a limit. Only so that courses don’t need to be 7000+ metres. All said and done golf for amatures is about having fun whilst enjoying the game.
    Long putters should of been left to personal preference for pros and us amatures

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Shawn Noack,
      Thanks Shawn for the blog post. I appreciate you taking the time to write in. Great points and I agree with you.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  59. Danny McDaniel says:

    I think it is stupid to eliminate the belly or long putter. This is not allowing the player a “freedom of choice”- to chose what he would like to play with. If the USGA and R&A want to do something good- then make the ball not as hot- make the clubs not as hot- to many pro’s are hitting it over 300 to 350 yards. Courses are being made 7500 yards or more- do something that means something. Jack Nicklaus won 18 majors and 73 tournaments- Tiger has won 14 majors and 74 tournaments with the short putter- hey! They should make a rule against the short putter. I don’t see there reasoning here- “for the good of the game”- C’MON MAN!!!!!!

  60. Colin B., Toronto says:

    It’s just physics. To be anchored produces more stability than its opposite. More stability in putting is an advantage. Therefore, no anchoring, just like restrictions on ball tech, groove spec limits, club head sizes, etc. I agree with the ban for pros.

    But just like flag football and no slap-shot hockey, let the amateurs have fun. Lower the rims for under 6′ 2″ – go play!

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Collin B, Toronto,
      Thanks Collin. You bring up good points, but then again we want to measure ourselves to the pro’s. That’s the beauty of golf. I could play Tiger head to head with shots just like you could. Having different rules changes the game too much.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  61. joe cooke says:

    A better question is why does the usga and pga allow pros to wear metal spikes and amatures can not wear them. There should be different rules for amatures seeking to become pros and pros.This should include dress to anything not conforming to the orignal royal acient golf rules. However when it comes to amatures and seniors who will never play professional golf, many of the rules should be different to allow them to enjoy the game because they are the ones who spend money to support the golf courses and golf equipment maker who supply pros with the equipment free of charge and pay them to endorse their equipment.
    Thank-you

    • CJ Goecks says:

      Joe Cooke,
      Thanks Joe for the blog post. Keep in mind the PGA and the USGA doesn’t ban players from spikes in shoes. It is the course that chooses to do that for maintenance of the course. A majority of pya tour players use soft spikes. I Wish I could wear them. I think it makes a difference on side hill lies, but again it is the course that bans the spikes not the USGA or the PGA.

      Keep em Long and Straight,
      CJ

  62. j.t.kemp says:

    anchor putting? i vote no. how about “those” that can drive a golf ball 300 yards all the time in the fairway? maybe “some” of us need to have “a crutch” for a drive or a golf ball that goes farther, SO WE can be on the SAME 300 YARD landing area as “those” that hit it 300 yards all the time? OR,MAYBE we can just “all learn how to putt”.

  63. Steve says:

    I think the long putters do provide an advantage when putting. I have several friends who have become much better putters using the belly putter. I think its unfair and Im glad to see them banned.
    Why don’t I switch to one?…….golf is a game of honor……the belly putter is like cheating.
    Sorry, thats how I feel about it.

  64. Martha Kimmich says:

    Allow it for the Champions’ or Senior Tour as it may help some experienced golfers stay in the game longer as physical limitations (like arthritis or jumpy nerves) inhibit normal play. Handicapped players (such as war veterans or athletic injury players) might be helped by it too.

  65. Russ Hardesty says:

    I agree with you. What this new rule will do is punish the 15% who anchor their putter. The purity of the game was sacrificed long ago as you point out. I have used every kind of putter in my 50 or so years of playing golf and see no real advantage to anchoring. If it were the advantage the purists claim it is, everyone would be using it. This is a lot to do about nothing.

  66. Paul Minter says:

    I disagree talking to history @ very early & minimal usage of the long putter is academic, as stated it’s only in recent times the increase has been seen & therefore has led to a ruling. I agree entirely with the rule , just wish it had not lingered into 2016

    Tiger has it right the putter just as all other clubs in the bag should not be anchored to the body, while all other equipment progressions in the game may have led to improved & more consistant play, none involve anchoring.

    Seems odd that I have not seen any ladies on the LPGA using the long or belly putter, & with the exception of Ernie the majority of other male pro’s look very girlie when putting with these awful crutches

  67. Jack says:

    Maybe they will ban the Perfect Conection golf swing next. LOL
    How you swing, or stroke a putt provides no advantage over others since they also can use the method or equipment. We would be better served if they revived stupid rules like not fixing spike marks on the green.

  68. David says:

    I think that this is a problem because it wasn’t dealt with sooner and it is unfair and too late to change to the traditional hands only style. I feel personally that anchoring is wrong however because the hands are being assisted and the stroke is not the same. Sam Snead had to abandon his croquet like stroke years ago to a modified approach closer to the traditional style. But again I say its too late in this case.
    By the way, long putters allow longer practice sessions since there is less strain on the back.

  69. AL GABRIELLI says:

    I tinkered with the belly putter for part of last season here on Long Island . . it didn’t help that much, BUT what it did was give me a better stroke for not anchoring it and using a similar stroke as if I was using the BP . . .the USGA and its affiliated golf groups are wrong, dead wrong for opposing such a innovation even though it has been almost 30 years in use by someone on the tour and in the amateur ranks . . . anchoring doesn’t help anyone unless they have a good stroke and can truly putt in the first place . . .and I agree with you, if it is such a great advantage why haven’t Stricker and others latched on to it? The game has far too many rules that hamper its progress and I have been playing for 40+ years now . . . it is simply sour grapes by a group of millionaires who want to monopolize the game even though it is never going to happen . . .thanks for allowing comments on this . . I might use the BP next year in protest of the ancient rules of golf . . .

  70. Larry Pyle says:

    The USGA & R&A would better serve the golfing world if they would encourage people to play ready golf instead of wasting so much time between strokes. I don’t care what kind of putter you use as long as you get up there and hit it. This walk back and forth, grab a club, wiggle waggle, get another club, repeat several times, then hit a bad shot, is killing golf. These same people stand in the fairway 200 yards from the green waiting for it to clear, then hit the ball 100 yards. They can putt with a cue stick and I don’t care, as long as they just do it!

  71. tiger168 says:

    Golf is a game of longevity. When one says for the “Good of the game.” It really means, you have to look beyond the current events/situations. The folks at USGA and R&A know this is not a popularity contest. They are respected and seasoned.

    There is really no reason going into the list of players name or other irrelevent issues brought up here.

    Golf, when played at its highest level, its not about technology, it’s not even about the swing, it is all mental/psychological. Those who play the game knows that. So why bother with your arguments?

    Putting is the ultimate equalizer of the game. It is a unique and separate games on it’s own, once you reach the green.

    When you are happy with an approach that is 50-60 feet from the hole from 250 yard away. The mental game just got started. That is golf.

    The folks at USGA and R&A know what they are doing. They are not just playing the game, they are also governing the game.

    They admitted mistakes, and remove silly rules, but, this isn’t one of them.

    God bless Golf!!!

  72. Barry says:

    This is not yet a done deal. The ruling is “proposed” and is out for public comment. You can submit a comment by sending an email to
    feedback@usga.com, and put “Rule 14-1 Change” in the subject line so it will get routed to the right place. If you don’t like this proposed change, I suggest you let the USGA know about it.

  73. Jay Risso says:

    Stricker hasn’t changed because he doesn’t need to change. Most of those who use the anchored putter use it because their nerves won’t allow them to use a regular putter anymore. It happens, and it’s a part of golf. The yips and any other maladies can be conquered with the anchored putter, but that doesn’t mean it is right. Good, perhaps, but not in the true spirit of the game. Players like Freddie Couples and VJ Singh will now have to conquer their nerves and twitchy wrists by practice and perserverance, or give up the tour. Sad, but part of golf.

  74. Allen Waltman says:

    The belly and long putters are doing the same thing as any one who the left hand low style , claw grips or pop can grip that your seeing on tour are all looking for a better way to put the ball in the hole and I dont see them ruling those out. When it comes down to it its not how its always been how many????

  75. Dave Green says:

    Hi CJ,
    When I see a guy on the first tee with along putter I’m looking at him and thinking to myself that this guy has a bad case of the YIPS.
    Dave

  76. Jerry Appelbaum says:

    I’m not to sure what to think. Do you remember when the late, great,
    Sam Snead,began experimenting with a croquet style stance and grip.
    The USGA promptly put a rule change in place,that effectively ended
    that. I had tried putting that way and found it really helped to read and make long putts. It seems this current rule change is a little gentler,since it doesn’t go into effect for a few years.I guess that’s the “rub of the green” we play it as it lies,including rule changes.

  77. Tom Ryberg says:

    I agree. If a player can play standing on their head, so be it. Ruling on the method is inappropriate and will open many cans of worms. Setting standards for equipment based on results is OK, but there are grey areas. Traditions have been violated for centuries, from dress to equipment. Even style of play has been controlled, ie, straddling the putting line. I think that anchoring is a non-issue with only a few utilizing it at all levels. It’s not magic.

  78. Eugene McGlynn says:

    I think that the rule makes sense and the anchoring of a club should be banned. If you can’t play within the rules then you should look to a different game. As you stated in your article careers have been revived going to anchoring the club. This is not what Golf should be. There is not suppose to be an advantage for any player over an opponet.

  79. E G Howells says:

    My thoughts are to support the ban. Play the game as it was meant to be played – hands only on a club. Naturally, there will be players who are better putters in the same way that some players have an adsvantage of being able to hit it further. Let us all learn that the skills with the putter is imperative to the game. A with all things – practice makes perfect and for all to abide by the same rules. There are so many styles of putters – far more than any other club – so let them find one to their liking and play with it. Two hands on it and no other contact. Vary your grip as much as you like but no anchors.

  80. Charlie R says:

    Sorry, but I don’t agree with your opinion. I own and have used a belly putter, btw. But an anchored swing should not be part of the golf game any more than someone should be allowed by the rules to putt with a pool cue or putt straddle of the line. And they have not proposed to ban the long putters – they have proposed that they not be allowed to anchor them to the body.

  81. James Pickard says:

    I agree, there is no advantage, the ball is the biggest technological advancement for the modern game. I am a PGA pro from the UK and I think the biggest advantage on the putting green is probably being able to draw a line on the ball!! I use a line on the ball to great advantage and I think it is far more of an advantage than having an anchored putter!! Tiger wants the putter to be the shortest club in the bag, he along with many other top tour pros think it’s an advantage, If it was they would change. If the USGA and the R&A want to make the game more traditional lets get the ball going shorter and make alignment on the green about using your eyes not a line on the ball!!

  82. WIlliam Brady says:

    I do not see any advantage in using an ancored putter. I do noot use one. I feel that it takesmjusst as much skill getting to us it as it does useing a normal club

  83. Peter Munn says:

    I was neutral until I saw the “long” putter being used in the “club length” relief scenario. Although watching Adam Scott and Keegan Bradley putting is anything but pretty!!

    Peter Munn
    Holywood GC Co.Down Northern Ireland

  84. Brian Stewart says:

    I totally agree with the ruling, You can use a long putter but can’t anchor it to your body. Try to get the ball in the hole like the rest of us. The long putter anchored makes it look like the players are afraid to miss. Well we are all afraid to miss, so suck it up and hit the putt with a free flowing stroke.

  85. John Lozano says:

    I agree that the belly putter is an advantage in steadying the putter. I also agree that pros can keep playing longer but there are so many stupid rules in golf that are unfair like hitting a twig in the backswing while in hazard or shot penalty if your ball moves while addressing the ball with putter.
    I have felt for a long time that the belly putter should be outlawed because years ago Sam Snead was forbidden to putt between the legs while facing the hole. He was not even anchoring the putter. I think he went to putting from the side while facing the hole.
    When you get older and can’t hit the ball very hard you can’t spin the ball or get benefit from these newer clubs and balls. If you get the yipps, too bad, you have to live with that and play the best you can.

  86. morris says:

    I agree with the ruling.
    Over the course of this summer i was putting terribly and experimented with all types of putter lengths and grips. I found that the best role off the putter was the long putter, but wasn’t as consistant as the belly putter. I would have switched to a non-conventional length putter but always felt it wasn’t legal in the intent of the rules of golf. Later in the summer i changed my putting stroke to be more in tuned with my putter. My putter is a face balanced putter and i was taking to much inside and changed to straight back and thru and started making putts.

  87. Allan Coates says:

    I agree with CJ, if it was a real advantage why have the whole of the PGA not changed already?

  88. Harry says:

    The USGA and R&A are not considering all the amatuer players who have purchased these belly and long putters and some of them at great cost. It’s OK for Pro’s who get there equipment free but as said amatuers have purchased these at great cost. Will the USGA and R&A refund the cost of these putters

  89. tom says:

    Seems like the stroke in putting is considered a part of the game/tradition. The long putter does help as it tens to fix the wrist and those that returned to short seem to have improved. Probably a minor difference but i can see major change in use in, say, 29 years. This apparently is waht they wish to stop.
    This si different than saying it’s an advantage to anyone player. Actually Els and Simpsom backed into their victories.

  90. Michael says:

    Now that they’re going to ban anchor putting on the golf course I’ll have to put mine back on the boat! :0)

Leave a Comment


IMPORTANT: Please use this Questions & Comments section so we can all help each other get better at this great game of golf, and to let me know how I can better serve YOU.

If you find yourself in need of Customer Support, please call 877-228-7088.